Legal Opinion
Virdanco, Inc. v. MTS International
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 5, 1990No. 89CA0093PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge CRISWELL.
Defendants, MTS International and Robert C. Hughes, appeal from an order of the trial court directing that judgment enter against them “in the minimum amount of $30,000” and directing that a master be appointed to prepare an accounting between the parties. However, because we are convinced that such order is not a final judgment, and could not be made final under C.R.C.P. 54(b), we dismiss the appeal without prejudice.
Plaintiff, Virdanco, Inc., initiated this action alleging that defendants had breached certain fiduciary obligations, which arose as a result of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Radio Station Wow, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Harding Glass Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,552 International Controls Corp. v. Robert L. Vesco, and Vesco & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Pearl BurnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- BALL CORPORATION v. LoranColorado Court of Appeals · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Salazar v. General Steel Domestic Sales, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- Virdanco, Inc. v. MTS InternationalColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- In re the Marriage of SchelpColorado Court of Appeals · 2008