Legal Opinion

People v. Carlson

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 2003No. 01CA1125PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge WEBB.

Defendant, David Carlson, appeals the judgment of conviction for theft by deception on the grounds of a defective indictment, insufficient evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, an erroneous evidentiary ruling, and cumulative error. We affirm.

Defendant sold a car to the victim, who testified that defendant misled him concerning its mileage and prior ownership. Based *415on the misrepresentations, the victim gave defendant a $1,100 down payment and signed a promissory note, in exchange for delivery of the car. The People did not establish the difference between the value of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. People v. HuckleberrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. People v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. Berglund-Cherne Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  5. People v. SnookSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. PahlColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. People v. GrantColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People v. RinconColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. People v. JamesColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. People v. KyleColorado Court of Appeals · 2004

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API