Legal Opinion

People v. Snook

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 2, 1987No. 86SC353PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSON, Justice.

The defendant, Roland Snook, was convicted by a jury of sexual assault on a child, section 18-3-405, 8 C.R.S. (1978 & 1983 Supp.). The court of appeals reversed the conviction under CRE 608(a) because the victim’s character for truthfulness had not been attacked prior to admission of expert opinion testimony about the capacity of children to fabricate claims of sexual assault. People v. Snook, 729 P.2d 1026 (Colo.App.1986). We granted the prosecution’s petition for certiorari and now affirm the court of appeals, and return the case to the court of appeals with directions to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wilson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Tevlin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. People v. KoonColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  5. People v. KoonColorado Court of Appeals · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. People v. GaffneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. People v. EppensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. People v. WittreinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  4. People v. FasySupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. Venalonzo v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API