Legal Opinion

Prigge v. Carmichael

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1963Published

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment of the circuit court which is based upon findings of fact and conclusions of law. Since the challenged judgment arose out of an action at law, all ancillary facts are binding upon us and cannot be retried if they are supported by substantial evidence. The action sought judgment for the balance unpaid upon a promissory note in the denomination of $21,673.21 which the defendants signed January 2, 1952, and rendered payable to the plaintiffs. The defendants alleged a novation. Accordingly, the execution of the note and its validity were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lutz v. WilliamsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Grant-Holub Co. v. GoodmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Vawter v. Rogue River Valley Canning Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Credit Bureaus Adjustment Department v. Cox Bros.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Haines v. Pacific BancorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API