Anderson v. Anderson

EAGLES, Judge.

We first consider plaintiff’s contention that the trial court erred in restricting its findings of fact to the existence or nonexistence of an agreement. We hold that the trial court did not improperly restrict its findings of fact and did not err in considering whether the parties had an agreement.

At the end of the hearing the trial judge made the following statement:

[T]he arrangement, if any, was in the nature of a lease of the property. I cannot find from the evidence that there was — by preponderance of the evidence that there was any agreement either implied or otherwise or…