Legal Opinion
U. S. Metal Products Co. v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 8, 1969No. 68-C-913PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge.
This action has been instituted under Section 1346(a) (2), 28 U.S.C.A., for the recovery from the Government of $6,237.44, representing the balance due to the plaintiff under a contract with the Government, which has interposed as a defense, an offset in the same amount, claimed to be due the Government under another contract. Plaintiff moves to strike the answer and for summary judgment under Rule 56, Fed.Rules Civ. Proc., 28 U.S.C.A.
There were two contracts between the plaintiff and the Government, the first made on February 9, 1965, and the second on June 28,1965.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Zavelo v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- In Re Greenpoint Metallic Bed Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Peterson Steels, Inc. v. SeidmonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- J. Clarke Smith and Margaret D. Smith v. Edwin E. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- In the Matter of Miracle Mart, Inc., DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Federal's, Inc. v. Edmonton Investment Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- United States of America, Small Business Administration v. Loris C. BridgesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- CBS, Inc. v. AhernDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Federal's, Inc. v. Edmonton Investment CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1975
- Vecco Construction Industries, Inc. v. Century Construction Co. of Washington (In Re Vecco Construction Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.