Legal Opinion

Federal's, Inc. v. Edmonton Investment Company

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided November 19, 1975No. 72-1933-PPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOINER, District Judge.

These cross appeals in bankruptcy raise questions about the debtor’s and receiver’s liability for an unexpired real property lease affected by a Chapter XI arrangement. 1 The subject of dispute is a 20-year lease agreement, dated January 11, 1971, requiring monthly rent payments of $11,288.98 plus taxes and interest. Under the terms of the lease, Federal’s, Inc., the debtor and lessee, had the right to assign its rights under the lease, but continued liable on the lease for any assignments made without the prior written consent of the lessor,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

Farrington v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
Securities & Exchange Commission v. American Trailer Rentals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
Arthur J. Rooks v. American Brass Company, a Connecticut CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
United States v. ErdossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
Mohonk Realty Corporation v. Wise Shoe StoresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

Federal's, Inc. v. Edmonton Investment Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
Matter of Fred Sanders Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
Polysat, Inc. v. Union Tank Car Co. (In Re Polysat, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
Matter of Barney Schogel, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1981
In Re M/v Peacock, on the Complaint of Oskco Edwards, Harry M. Tompkins, and Fair Field Industries. Tracy Maudlin v. M/v Peacock, on the Complaint of Oskco Edwards, Harry M. Tompkins, and Fair Field Industries v. Dianne Craig, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.