Legal Opinion

Banks v. Brazze

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1949No. Appeal, 33PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Claimant’s husband, a laborer in the employ of defendant, suffered a rupture of the ileum while doing his usual work in the usual way. There was no evidence of overexertion. The referee from the circumstances, found an accident established by the extraordinary nature of “the effect rather than the cause” and accordingly made an award based upon a finding that his death resulted from .the accidental injury. The board ultimately affirmed the award on additional findings which it made, supplementing those of the referee, as follows: “Fourth: On September 25, 1944, at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parks v. Miller Printing MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Buck v. ArndtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Rovere v. Interstate Cemetery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Stufflet v. Fraternal Order of EaglesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Smith v. A. De O. Rossiter & Sons Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lingle v. Lingle Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Cope v. Philadelphia Toilet Laundry & Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Shatto v. Bardinet Exports, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Rosso v. Aetna Steel Products Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Ricketts v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API