Legal Opinion

Holland v. Edelblute

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 8, 1942No. Record No. 2541PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

This was an action for damages for injuries inflicted in an automobile accident, in which Eugene Holland was plain*687tiff, and L. P. Howell and A. B. Edelblute were defendants. After all the evidence had been presented, the court below struck the plaintiff’s evidence on the ground that it failed to show any negligence by either of the defendants. The jury rendered a verdict for the defendants, and judgment was entered thereon. The action of the trial judge in striking the evidence is before us on review only as against the defendant Edelblute, inasmuch as plaintiff’s counsel admitted of record…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. HanburySupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  2. Sale v. FiggSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  3. Bloxom v. McCoySupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  4. Isenhour v. McGranighanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  5. Gregory v. DanielSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. William T. McCormick v. At & T Technologies, Inc. Cameron AllenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  2. Young v. Blue Line Storage Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  3. Rayborn v. FreemanMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
  4. White v. John DoeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966
  5. Meriweather v. Atlanta Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API