State v. Workman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Chief Justice.
Defendants assign as error the trial court’s denial of their motions to dismiss the charge of first-degree sexual offense on the ground that there was insufficient evidence of the essential elements of the offense to permit the jury to find defendants guilty. Specifically, defendants contend that the State failed to prove two essential elements: (1) that the sex act was without the consent of the alleged victim; and (2) that defendants displayed or employed a deadly weapon.
The crime of first-degree sexual offense is defined in G.S. 14-27.4, which provides in pertinent…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. RosemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. FranklinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. FullerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. HarshawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Kelly v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.