Legal Opinion

Barby v. Cabot Petroleum Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 18, 1991No. 91-6087PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiffs, the lessors, commenced this diversity action seeking to cancel portions of six oil and gas leases, asserting defendant, the lessee, breached its implied duty of further development under the leases by refusing to develop lower formations covered by the leases. The district court determined…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Garrick v. WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  2. Renner v. Monsanto Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Sarah M. Spaeth v. Union Oil Company of California, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  4. Hoyt v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Chapman v. BowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harrison v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Lauchle v. Keeton Group LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Paul M. Barby v. Cabot Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API