Legal Opinion
Hoyt v. Continental Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 8, 1980No. 53860PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARGRAVE, Justice:
This action was brought originally in the District Court of Dewey County, Oklahoma, praying for the cancellation of an oil and gas lease to Section 27, T18N, R17W, in addition to damages for failure to release that prevented plaintiff’s releasing the premises and receiving a bonus therefor in addition to acquiring a commercial oil and gas well on the property. Plaintiff moved for partial summary judgment on the cancellation issue and that motion was granted on September 13, 1978. The trial court certified the order sustaining the motion for partial summary judgment on the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Clifton v. KoontzTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- McVicker v. Horn, Robinson & NathanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Long v. Magnolia Petroleum CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
- Jones v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Brooks v. MinnHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- McCullough Oil, Inc. v. RezekWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
- Mullins v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- HALL v. GALMORSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Sarah M. Spaeth v. Union Oil Company of California, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Pack v. Santa Fe MineralsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.