Legal Opinion
Fiorella v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided February 2, 1960No. 6 Div. 730PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CATES, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order below reading partially:
“And on this the 16th day of April, 1959, the Court having heard the testimony in this case, and upon it being shown to the Court that the defendant has violated the terms of his probation, it is ordered by the Court that said probation be and the same is hereby revoked and his sentence put into effect.” 1
Fiorella had been charged and convicted of a lottery law violation for which he was sentenced to twelve months hard labor. September 25, 1958, the trial judge, upon consideration of Fiorella’s application and of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re J. P. Linahan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Manning v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Sparks v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
- Smith v. PelhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Seibold v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Allen v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1963
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Ex Parte BelcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.