Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Belcher

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 3, 1989No. 87-974PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted the writ of certiorari in order to review the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals upholding the trial court's revocation of petitioner's probation. The central question presented to us is whether the trial judge had before him sufficient evidence to show that the petitioner had violated a condition of his probation. In answering this question we must decide whether the fact that petitioner had been arrested and charged with a federal crime was sufficient, in and of itself, to show that petitioner had violated a condition of his probation.

The relevant facts are succinctly…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Fiorella v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  5. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Puckett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  2. O.M. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  3. Clayton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  4. Mallette v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  5. Chenault v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API