Legal Opinion
Fischer Sand & Aggregate Co. v. City of Lakeville
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 8, 1994No. Civ. 3-94-277PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MAGNUSON, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the Court grants the motion.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Fischer Sand and Aggregate Company and related entities (Plaintiffs) sought permits to open a gravel mine in Apple Valley, Minnesota, from the City of Apple Valley and other government bodies with jurisdiction. In order to open the mine, Plaintiffs were required to obtain new zoning designation for their property and variances or affirmative permission from several other agencies. Officials from the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kardules v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Kellar v. VonHoltumCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Manistee Town Center v. City Of GlendaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Manistee Town Center v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Mariana v. FisherDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.