Legal Opinion

Strauss v. Board of Supervisors

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 1960No. Civ. 23983PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KINCAID, J. pro tem.*

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles denying a peremptory writ of mandate sought by appellants herein.

The judgment in effect sustained the determination of the respondent board of supervisors that written protests to the proposed incorporation of the city of Hidden Hills had been filed, signed by owners representing 51 per cent or more of the total assessed valuation of the land within the proposed boundaries; that the board was, therefore, without jurisdiction, and that the proceeding for the incorporation be abandoned.

The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stafford v. Realty Bond Service Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Kirkwood v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Uhl v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Chester v. EinarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Rogers v. Board of Directors of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. NorwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Skinner v. SillasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Clark v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Cockerill v. City of ReddingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Daily v. City of PomonaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API