Cockerill v. City of Redding
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
Appellants City of Bedding and its council appeal from a judgment on a petition for certiorari by respondent landowners, ordering termination of proceedings under the Annexation Act of 1913. (Gov. Code, § 35100 et seq.) Prior to 1961 this act, which provides that protests filed by a majority (in assessed value) of landowners will defeat the annexation, contained no express provision authorizing the city council to permit withdrawal of protests once filed. Here, however, the city council permitted such withdrawals.
The sole question is whether in annexation proceedings municipalities possess…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Stafford v. Realty Bond Service Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
- American Distilling Co. v. City Council of SausalitoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Butcher v. BrouwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Schmidt v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Redwood City v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Lagrutta v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- City of Fresno v. Pinedale County Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Daily v. City of PomonaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- In Re Town of Spread EagleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962