Legal Opinion

Citizens' Commercial & Savings Bank v. Bay Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1896PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Mandamus by tbe Citizens’ Commercial & Savings Bank to compel Andrew C. Maxwell, circuit judge of Bay county, to proceed with the hearing of a suit in garnishment against the receiver of an insolvent corporation.

1Per curiam

The relator commenced an action of assumpsit against A. Mosher & Son, and recovered a judgment. A corporation known as the E. J. Vance Box Company was indebted to Mosher & Son. One Wilson H. Tousey had been appointed receiver of said corporation by the circuit court for the county of Bay, in chancery. The relator, soon after commencing suit against Mosher & Son, petitioned the-chancery court for leave to bring a suit in garnishment against the receiver, which was granted. The receiver filed a disclosure denying that he had any property in his hands belonging to said Mosher & Son, but…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Tremper v. BrooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Cohnen v. SweenieMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baird v. LeforNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Braun v. McPhersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Stephens v. Augusta Telephone & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Earle v. HumphreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API