Calland v. Nichols
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Gage county. Tried below before Appel get, J. cited: Ransom v. Getty, 14 Pac. Rep. [Kan.], 487 ; Teal v. Bilby, 123 U. S., 572; Mansfield v.JDole, 61 111., 191; Rey v. Toney, 24 Mo., 600 [69 Am. Dec., 414]; Wood v. Remide, 9 N. E. Rep. [Mass.], 831; Malaney v. Taft, 15 Atl. Rep. [Yt.], 327; Mills v. Qilbreth, 74 Am.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Gage county. Tried below before Appel get, J. cited: Ransom v. Getty, 14 Pac. Rep. [Kan.], 487 ; Teal v. Bilby, 123 U. S., 572; Mansfield v.JDole, 61 111., 191; Rey v. Toney, 24 Mo., 600 [69 Am. Dec., 414]; Wood v. Remide, 9 N. E. Rep. [Mass.], 831; Malaney v. Taft, 15 Atl. Rep. [Yt.], 327; Mills v. Qilbreth, 74 Am. Dec., 487. cited: Maynard v. Buck, 100 Mass., 40, 49; Best v. Yates, 1 Yent. [Eng.], 268; Lech v. Maestaer, 1 Camp. [N. P.], 138 ; Schouler, Bailment [2d Ed.], secs. 23,101; Edwards, Bailment, 236 ; Story, Bailment, sec. 443; 2 Parsons, Contracts,…
1Opinion of the Court
Maxwell, J.'
This action was brought in the district court of Gage county, by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover for feeding and caring for certain cattle of the defendant.
On the trial of the cause the jury returned a verdict for the defendant, upon which judgment was rendered.
The plaintiff alleges in his petition that “in the month of August, 1887, he made and entered into a contract with defendants to furnish feed for and take care of not to exceed 200 head of cattle for said defendants, jointly, which cattle were to be furnished to plaintiff for that purpose by said defendants.…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Shropshire v. SidebottomMontana Supreme Court · 1904
- Bodtke v. BrattenNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
- Mattern v. McCarthyNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Wilensky v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Cox v. ChaseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.