Legal Opinion

Esposito v. Esposito

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 20, 1978PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

158 N.J. Super. 285 (1978)

385 A.2d 1266

MURIEL ESPOSITO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

DANIEL JOSEPH ESPOSITO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 28, 1978.

Decided March 20, 1978.

Before Judges HALPERN, LARNER and KING.

Mr. James C. Orr argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Lum, Biunno & Tompkins, attorneys; Ms. Claire T. Barile on the brief).

Mr. Everett M. Scherer argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Riker, Danzig, Scherer & Debevoise, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by LARNER, J.A.D.

In this matrimonial action the wife appeals…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. Close v. Kordulak Bros.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. Rothman v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  4. Painter v. PainterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Lepis v. LepisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Amato v. AmatoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  3. Monte v. MonteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  4. Borodinsky v. BorodinskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. Lavene v. LaveneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API