Legal Opinion

Borodinsky v. Borodinsky

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 27, 1978PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

162 N.J. Super. 437 (1978)

393 A.2d 583

NATHAN BORODINSKY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

SYLVIA BORODINSKY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 12, 1978.

Decided September 27, 1978.

Before Judges LYNCH, CRANE and HORN.

Mr. Paul N. Silverman argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Silverman, Elwell & Denstman, attorneys; Mr. Sam Denstman on the brief).

Mr. Morris M. Schnitzer argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Schnitzer and Schnitzer, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by HORN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Nathan Borodinsky appeals from a final…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rothman v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  2. Painter v. PainterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  3. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  4. Lavene v. LaveneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  5. Wetzel v. WetzelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Bowen v. BowenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Torres v. Schripps, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  3. Lawing v. LawingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Wadlow v. WadlowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  5. Lawrence v. Lawrence (In Re Lawrence)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1999

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API