Legal Opinion
Amato v. Amato
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 5, 1981PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
180 N.J. Super. 210 (1981)
434 A.2d 639
JANET T. AMATO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JOHN J. AMATO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 27, 1981.
Decided August 5, 1981.
Before Judges BOTTER, KING and McELROY.
Arnold Koster argued the cause for appellant (Shevick, Ravich, Koster, Tobin, Oleckna & Reitman, attorneys).
Mortimer Katz argued the cause for respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by McELROY, J.A.D.
This matrimonial appeal raises but two issues, both of which concern segments of the equitable distribution award effected below pursuant to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Painter v. PainterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Kruger v. KrugerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Carlo v. the Okonite-Callender Cable Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Di Tolvo v. Di TolvoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Kimberlee Williams v. BASF Catalysts LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Mahoney v. MahoneySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Liles v. LilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Van De Loo v. Van De LooCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Lopiano v. LopianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.