Legal Opinion

Rothe v. Maloney Cadillac, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 25, 1986No. 85-903PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

Plaintiff appeals the dismissal with prejudice of counts III, IV and V of his six-count complaint against Maloney Cadillac, Inc. (Maloney), a Cadillac dealer, and Cadillac Motor Car Division, and General Motors Corporation (sometimes collectively General Motors), the manufacturer, based on alleged breaches of implied warranties. The issues presented include whether: (1) the doctrine of privity bars plaintiff’s action against General Motors; (2) Maloney can disclaim liability under a breach of implied warranty theory; and (3) plaintiff should have been allowed to replead the implied warranty…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Redarowicz v. OhlendorfIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Nobility Homes of Texas, Inc. v. ShiversTexas Supreme Court · 1977

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Rothe v. Maloney Cadillac, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In re Myford Touch Consumer LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  4. Coughlin v. SeRineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Johnson v. Earnhardt's Gilbert Dodge, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API