Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Earnhardt's Gilbert Dodge, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 2006No. CV-05-0204-PRPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RYAN, Justice.

¶ 1 With most goods, “a warranty that the goods shall be merchantable is implied in a contract for their sale if the seller is a merchant with respect to goods of that kind.” Ariz.Rev.Stat. (“A.R.S.”) § 47-2314(A) (2005). However, the implied warranty of merchantability for the sale of a used motor vehicle may be limited to fifteen days or five hundred miles, whichever occurs first. A.R.S. § 44-1267(B) (2003). To limit the implied warranty of merchantability to the statutory minimum, a dealer must include in the sales agreement a conspicuous statement in bold type that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. DRK PhotoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  2. Day v. LSI Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2016
  3. Buckholtz v. BuckholtzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. Best Buy Stores, L.P. v. Benderson-Wainberg Associates, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. Stevens Aviation, Inc. v. DynCorp International LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API