Legal Opinion
BMT Commodity Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 22, 1987No. Court 85-7-00915PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
Plaintiffs initiated this action to challenge the International Trade Commission’s (Commission) final affirmative dumping determination in Certain Dried Salted Codfish from Canada, Inv. No. 731-TA-199, USITC Pub. No. 1711. 1 In its determination, the Commission concluded that “the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded by reason of imports of dried heavy salted codfish from Canada, which the Department of Commerce (Commerce) has determined are sold at less than fair value (LTFV).” ITC Determination at 3.
The domestic industry under review…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- USX Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Kenda Rubber Indus. Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
3Cited by5 opinions
- Citrosuco Paulista, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- USX Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Metallverken Nederland B v. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- BMT Commodity Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Bmt Commodity Corp. And Delca Distributors Inc. v. The United States, Codfish Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988