Legal Opinion

Basinger v. Rogers & Wells

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 1990No. D009842PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NARES, J.

Rogers & Wells appeals from an order vacating voluntary dismissals and ordering entry of judgment nunc pro tunc to enforce a settlement agreement and award plaintiffs interest on tardy payment of settlement money. Rogers & Wells contends the order must be reversed because the court lacked jurisdiction once dismissals had been filed. Alternatively, on the merits Rogers & Wells contends it did not pay late because the condition precedent to its obligation to pay—Robert G. Basinger’s general release—had not been furnished, and in any event the settlement agreement does not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Munoz v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Associated Convalescent Enterprises v. Carl Marks & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Avila v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. McDonald v. SeveryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Palace Hardware Co. v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Sierra Club v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. H. D. Arnaiz Ltd. v. County of San JoaquinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Gauss v. GAF Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. O'DELL v. Freightliner Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API