Legal Opinion
Taylor v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 29, 2007No. 06-60275PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, Terrell Taylor challenges the district court’s determination that the Government satisfied the Due Process Clause in notifying him of the administrative forfeiture of $13,000, seized from Taylor upon his arrest for serious drug crimes. Because on this record the Government has failed to meet its burden to show that its notice was “reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise” Taylor of the forfeiture, Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314, 70 S.Ct. 652, 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950), we reverse and remand for an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Barrera-Montenegro v. USA & Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Armendariz-Mata v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Kadonsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. StevensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Langbord v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. IbrahimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Echavarria v. PittsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.