Legal Opinion
United States v. Ibrahim
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 14, 2008No. 07-50153PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Tamer Adel Ibrahim (Tamer) appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for return of property, which he filed pursuant to Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. There were no criminal charges pending at the time he filed the motion, so the district court treated it as a civil complaint governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The principal question before us is whether the court erred when it applied a preponderance of evidence standard to resolve the summary judgment motion, rather than determining whether there was a material fact…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Louis Eugene Russell v. Tom Rolfs, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Helfand v. GersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Leslie Ann Johnson v. State of Oregon Oregon Department of Human Resources, Rehabilitation DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. Liquidators of European Federal Credit BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Milton H. Greene Archives, Inc. v. Marilyn Monroe LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Hoopai v. HoopaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- O'Donnell v. Tristar Esperanza Properties, LLC (In Re Tristar Esperanza Properties, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Dilts v. Penske Logistics LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2011
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.