Legal Opinion
Fleck v. Fleck
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 1, 2004No. 97,428PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.
I. ISSUES
{ 1 The dispositive issue presented for our review is whether the appellant met her burden of producing a record sufficient to show that the trial court erred. We find that the appellant produced a substandard record for this Court's review and that the appellant's allegations of error are not supported by the record on appeal.
II. UNDISPUTED FACTS
Because no transcript or narrative statement is included in the record on appeal, this Court's review is confined to the docket sheet, the documents filed of record and designated for review by the parties, and the facts to which both…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Hamid v. Sew OriginalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Booth v. McKnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Daniel v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Davidson v. GregorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Phillips v. HedgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Cotner v. GoldenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Duke v. DukeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- CALYX ENERGY, LLC v. HALLCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- Gurley-Rodgers v. Brookhaven West Condominium Owners' Ass'nCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.