Legal Opinion

Shoemake v. Sinclair Refining Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 10, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.

As we are of opinion that there was error in the refusal of the trial court to dismiss this action by judgment as of nonsuit, in accordance with the motion of the defendants at the close of all the evidence, we shall not discuss the assignments of error on their appeal to this Court, on which they rely in support of their contention that they are entitled to a new trial. It is immaterial whether or. not the defendants R. L. Walser and A. F. Walser were partners, as contended by the plaintiff, or whether or not the relation of these defendants to tbeir codefendant Sinclair Refining Company was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Linville v. . NissenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Martin v. Greensboro-Fayetteville Bus LineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. . StevensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Tribble v. . SwinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Tribble v. SwinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Lindsey v. LeonardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Warren v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API