Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Baney

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 3, 2004PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEIN, J.:

¶ 1 Following a statewide grand jury investigation, Jeremy Michael Baney entered negotiated guilty pleas to 30 out of 91 charges relating to his central role in a drug distribution ring across Lycoming, Clinton, and Centre Counties. Baney appeals the negotiated aggregate sentence of 240 to 468 months’ incarceration. On appeal, Baney’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). See Commonwealth v. McClendon, 495 Pa. 467, 434 A.2d 1185 (1981). After counsel filed the Anders brief, defendant filed his own pro se brief.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. McClendonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. MuhammadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NischanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. DempsterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Commonwealth v. YorgeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Commonwealth v. BruceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. BennettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API