Legal Opinion
Ohio Export Trading Co. v. Natl. Surety
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 19, 1926No. 19057PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
Did Fraunhofer and Haas occupy the positions of managing director and vice president, respectively? It is conceded that they -performed the duties of those two positions, hut the Court of Appeals held that Fraunhofer and Haas were not occupying the offices named at the time the several acts of dishonesty charged to them were committed.
To decide this question we must consider the facts of the record, which are as follows:
Early in 1920 the Ohio Export & Trading Company entered into a contract with H. V. Fraunhofer, under which he was made the exclusive agent of the company to sell its capital…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Trustees of Phillips Academy v. Inhabitants of AndoverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- McShane v. Howard BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
- Atlantic Trust & Deposit Co. v. Town of LaurinburgCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1908
- London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America v. Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- First Bank of Marietta, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- American Employers Insurance Company v. Metro Regional Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Alfalfa Electric Coop., Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1973
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. American Centennial Insurance Co.Lucas County Court of Common Pleas · 1995
- City Loan & Savings Co. v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.