Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. Lochmandy Buick Sales, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 8, 1962No. 13542_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILEY, Circuit Judge.

In this diversity action the court, without a jury, entered a declaratory judgment that plaintiff insurer was not required, under its garage policy covering Lochmandy Buick Sales, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Buick), to defend or to pay any judgment rendered against it in a personal injury action. Buick has appealed.

Buick is an Indiana corporation which sells and services Buick cars in Elkhart, Indiana. Plaintiff is a Connecticut corporation which issued the policy herein involved.

Buick’s president Lochmandy was asked to provide automobiles for an American Legion…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  2. Young v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. BrimIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Wehner v. FosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. United States v. Danny Mack MartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Miller v. DiltsIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Great American Insurance v. C. G. Tate Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company v. Max D. Rynearson, Etc., and Third-Party v. Porter and Boston, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  4. Columbia Casualty Co. v. Federal Press Co. (In Re Federal Press Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
  5. The Century Indemnity Company v. Dan Serafine and Francis De RosaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API