Legal Opinion

Wehner v. Foster

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1951No. 17, Calendar No. 45,112PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

This is a garnishment proceeding by plaintiffs seek to enforce payment by Citizens’ Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, garnishee defendant, of a judgment under the property damage coverage of an automobile insurance policy.

The facts are not in dispute and are as follows: On. January 3, 1947, Abner J. Foster, Jr., bought a policy of insurance from the Citizens’ Mutual Automobile Insurance Company which contained the following under the heading,

“Conditions:
“Upon the occurrence of an accident or loss covered by this policy, written notice shall be given by or on behalf of the assured to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Foster v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Purefoy v. Pacific Automobile Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. McCarthy v. RendleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Coolidge v. Standard Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Wendel v. SwanbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Tenneco Inc. v. Amerisure Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. West American Insurance v. Yorkville National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Kermans v. PendletonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Upjohn Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1991

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API