Legal Opinion

Romsdahl v. Town of Long Lake

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 22, 1928No. 26,778PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Defendants appealed from a judgment directing that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue commanding them to open a road and make it suitable for travel.

On October 28, 1918, the supervisors of defendant town made an order refusing to lay out and establish a certain proposed highway one and one-half miles in length. An appeal was taken to the district court where a jury reversed the board. On July 19, 1920, judgment was entered establishing the proposed highway. Since then plaintiffs’ repeated requests for action have been fruitless; hence this proceeding. Defendants assert that they do not have…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Olson v. HonettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Leonard v. WakemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  3. State ex rel. Olson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. State ex rel. Smith v. Town of SomersetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Silver v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Spurck v. Civil Service BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Curry v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. State ex rel. Draper v. FreeseNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Zion Evangelical Lutheran Church of Detroit Lakes v. City of Detroit LakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API