Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Texaco, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 27, 1975No. 896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOUNG, Justice.

This case presents the question of whether one of the parties named as lessor can forfeit an oil and gas lease as to his interest only when written notice of lessee’s default of a drilling covenant is given by him and some of the others but not all of the parties named as lessor.

J. Bruce Hancock and others sued Texaco, Inc., for a partial forfeiture and cancellation of an oil and gas agreement and to remove cloud on plaintiffs’ title caused by defendant’s failure and refusal voluntarily to furnish plaintiffs with a partial release of that agreement. The case was tried…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ryan v. KentTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Jameson v. Chanslor-Canfield Midway Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Parker v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Wisdom v. MinchenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Burtis v. Butler Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Seal v. KnorppCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. Edward Charles Sebesta, Sr. v. Quinoco Petroleum, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1992
  3. Seal v. KnorppCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. Warren L. Seal, Cross-Appellant v. J. Ronald Knorpp, Etc., Florida Exploration Company and Enron Corporation, Cross-Appellees. Warren L. Seal v. Apache Corporation of Delaware, Florida Exploration Company and Enron CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API