Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Martines

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 2015No. 90926-1PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

¶1 — Jose Figeroa Martines was involved in a car accident. Pursuant to a warrant, a blood sample was extracted from Martines after an officer suspected he was driving while under the influence (DUI). The blood tests revealed a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of about 0.061 and markers of two different central nervous system depressants. Martines was charged with felony DUI under RCW 46.61.502. He sought to suppress the blood test results showing the presence of drugs on the ground that there was no probable cause to show he was under the influence of drugs, as opposed to alcohol. The trial…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. State v. RileyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. FricksWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. TheinWashington Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Tamisha Pearson v. City Of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. State v. FrescolnCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2017
  4. State v. SwartzMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State Of Washington v. William Witkowski & Tina BervenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API