Legal Opinion
Rosinsky v. City of Binghamton
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 13, 1972PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Paul J. Yesawich, Jr.,
J. Plaintiff, a Binghamton policeman, seeks summary judgment declaring his entitlement to salary and other statutory benefits under section 207-c of the General Municipal Law. Alternatively he seeks an order dismissing the city’s affirmative defenses and directing the defendants to pay him his regular salary and other section 207-c benefits pending the determination of this action.
Plaintiff claims he was injured on January 12, 1970 while performing his police duties. Thereafter he made a claim against the City of Binghamton for workmen’s compensation benefits, and on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ogino v. BlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Drier v. Randforce Amusement Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Claim of Sauer v. American Car & Foundry Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cicala v. Disability Review BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Crawford v. Sheriff's DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- De John v. Town of FrankfortAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Rosato v. HasenhauerNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- Youngs v. Village of Penn YanNew York Supreme Court · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.