Kay County, Excise Board v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WELCH, V. C. J.
The excise board approved the annual budget of this independent school district, including an item appropriated to buy band uniforms. The protest here involved questions the legality of that appropriation, urging that such item of appropriation is for an unauthorized and therefore illegal purpose. The only question presented is whether such an appropriation within the general fund may be legally made for such purposes.
Section 1, article 2, chapter 34, S. L. 1936-37, amendatory of section 6867, O. S. 1931, 70 Okla. St. Ann. see. 189, provides in material part as follows:
“Section…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- County of Coles v. GoehringIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. BaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Folk v. State Capital Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Rexroth v. HollowayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hartzell v. ConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Texas Co. v. State ex rel. CoryellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Chatham Corp. v. Dann InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Penn v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- Miskofsky v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.