Legal Opinion

Exxon Corp. v. Garza

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided October 27, 1998No. 04-97-00325-CVPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICKHOFF, Justice.

Omar Garza sued Exxon Corporation for injuries he sustained on one of its gas leases. In accordance with the jury’s verdict, the trial court signed a judgment awarding Garza $494,385. Because we conclude that the evidence is legally insufficient to establish that Exxon had actual or constructive knowledge of an unreasonably dangerous condition on the lease, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and render judgment that Garza take nothing from Exxon.

Factual and Procedural Background

Exxon owns and operates a natural gas lease, known as the Yates Lease, in Duval County.…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Keetch v. Kroger Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. CAT Contracting, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Redinger v. Living, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Clayton W. Williams, Jr., Inc. v. OlivoTexas Supreme Court · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Deutsch v. Hoover, Bax & Slovacek, L.L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  2. Quanaim v. Frasco Restaurant & Catering, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  3. SLT Dealer Group, Ltd. v. AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  4. Laurel v. Herschap, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  5. E-Z Mart Stores, Inc. v. Ronald Holland's A-Plus Transmission & Automotive, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API