Legal Opinion

Laurel v. Herschap

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided September 22, 1999No. 04-98-00706-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLEE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

Opinion by:

PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.

Appellee’s motion for rehearing is GRANTED. This court’s opinion and judgment dated June 23, 1999 are withdrawn, and this opinion and judgment are substituted.

Ricardo Laurel (“Laurel”) appeals a summary judgment rendered in favor of Howard Herschap d/b/a HRH Operating, Inc. (“HRH”). In his sole point of error, Laurel asserts that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of HRH based on a no duty argument because HRH had a duty to exercise control with reasonable care.

The motion for rehearing…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Casso v. BrandTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Moore v. K Mart Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
  2. Saenz v. David & David Const. Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
  3. Traylor Bros., Inc. v. Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
  4. 1701 Commerce Acquisition, LLC v. MacQuarie US Trading, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2022
  5. Bernard Morello v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API