Legal Opinion
Cleveland, C. & S. Ry. Co. v. Knickerbocker Trust Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio
Decided April 12, 1898No. 5,156PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICKS, District Judge.
The intervener seeks to obtain a preferential lien for work done and performed and material furnished for the Cleveland, Canton & Southern Railroad Company upon the pier, and abutments of the Independence street bridge over the Cuyahoga river, in the city of Cleveland, and, with that end in view, sets up three grounds for recovery: (1) A mechanic’s lien is asserted. (2) It is asserted that at least a portion of its claim is preferred under the order of the court appointing the receiver, in which six months’ claims for material, supplies, and labor are to be paid out of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Union Trust Co. v. Illinois Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Miltenberger v. Logansport Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Burnham v. BowenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Toledo, Delphos & Burlington Railroad v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Porter v. Pittsburg Bessemer Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Interurban Const. Co. v. Central State Bank of KieferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Pittsburg Equitable Meter Co. v. CaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. DoudCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900