Legal Opinion
In Re Thames
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided March 26, 2001No. 3326PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
344 S.C. 564 (2001)
544 S.E.2d 854
In the Matter of Doris W. THAMES.
Doris W. Verdery, Individually as an Interested party, and as Attorney-in-fact for Doris W. Thames, Appellant,
v.
Betty Jane Daniels and C. Covert Daniels, Respondents.
No. 3326.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina.
Heard October 12, 2000.
Decided March 26, 2001.
A.F. Carter, III, of Carter Law Firm, of Orangeburg, for appellant.
Steven S. McKenzie, of Coffey, Chandler & Johnson, of Manning, for respondents.
STILWELL, Judge:
Doris W. Verdery brought this action seeking to set aside a power of attorney and a revocation of an earlier power…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Testa v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Matter of HowardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- In Re Estate of WeeksCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- In Re: Nightingale's EstateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Watson v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
- Seabrook Island Property Owners Ass'n v. Marshland Trust, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Gaddy v. DouglassCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Hairston v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
- In re: Rosa Mack LeeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.