Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hairston v. McMillan

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 15, 2010No. 4657PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKonduros, J.

Michelle Hairston challenged the validity of her uncle’s February 2006 will (the Will) on the grounds he was without testamentary capacity to execute the Will and the Will was the product of undue influence. The special referee found the Will to be valid. Hairston appealed. We affirm.

FACTS

Normall O. Hudson (Decedent) was released from the hospital into home hospice care on Friday, February 24, 2006. At that time, his niece, Michelle Hairston, and her father, Olin Parker, were in town to check on Decedent’s condition. Decedent’s companion, Kathleen McMillan, and her daughter, Nancy McMillan…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Estate of NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. In Re Estate of WeeksCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Calhoun v. CalhounSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  4. Mock v. DowlingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  5. Hembree v. Estate of HembreeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re AtwaterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. Gunnells v. HarknessCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020
  3. Swiger by and through DeHaven v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API