Walker v. Sliger
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chattin
Since the appeals of the above styled actions present the same question, Counsel for the respective parties have agreed one opinion will suffice.
Defendants-in-error, George C. Sliger, and Alex J. Iiarkness, were candidates in a primary election held in the City of Knoxville for the purpose of nominating candidates for the office of Councilman of the City on *659November 4, 1965. Sliger and Harkness were declared to be two of tbe candidates in a runoff election to be beld on November 18, 1965.
As a result of tbe runoff election, both Sliger and Harkness were elected to the office of Councilman.
On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Skelton v. BarnettTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
- Heiskell v. LoweTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
- Freeman v. FeltsTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
- Adcock v. HoukTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
- Taylor v. CarrTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hubbard v. AmmermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Inman v. BrockTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
- Brackin v. Sumner County ex rel. Sumner County Board of County CommissionersTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Gilpatrick v. ReneauTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
- Moyers v. SherrodTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.