Legal Opinion
Biglow v. Boeing Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided November 29, 2001No. CIV.A.00-2370-KHVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Kevin Lee Biglow brings employment discrimination and retaliation claims against The Boeing Company (“Boeing”) under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983. 1 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. # 148) filed October 17, 2001. For reasons stated below, the Court sustains defendant’s motion.
Summary Judgment Standard
Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show no genuine issue…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Garmin International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Annett v. University of KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002