Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtClaRKsoN, J.

This is an action for actionable negligence brought by plaintiff against the defendant for injuries alleged to have been sustained by him. The defendant introduced no evidence and at' the close of plaintiff’s evidence made a motion for judgment as in ease of nonsuit. C. S., 567. This motion was sustained by the court below. Plaintiff assigned error and appealed to this Court.

The testimony of plaintiff was to the effect: That on 2 January, 1924, he was engaged in car-repairing work for defendant at Hamlet. That he was directed by the foreman of defendant to make repairs on a refrigerator car.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crisp v. Hanover Thread Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Bradford v. EnglishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Cherry v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Hines v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jarvis v. Erwin Cotton Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API