Farlee v. Farlee

The defendant is not entitled to have the levy under the attachment set aside. He is in contempt of the Court of Chancery of New Jersey in the payment of alimony to the plaintiff, which the plaintiff is seeking to recover in this action and the facts reveal a studied attempt to defeat the collection of this alimony since the order to show cause was served upon him under which the present amount of alimony was fixed.

The order to show cause why the allowance for alimony should not be increased was served upon him November 29, 1926, and within a month, on December 21, 1926, he assigned to his…