Smith v. North River Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Arthur Dixon and Fred Williams were involved with the same woman. At a party, attended by all three, Dixon shot Williams to death. In the process, Clifford Smith was also wounded. Smith sued Dixon alleging negligence and wantonness. Dixon called upon his insurer, North River Insurance, to defend the action. North River refused, claiming that the shooting was excluded by the terms of its homeowners policy with Dixon. The insurer filed a declaratory judgment action, and joined as defendants the parties to the tort action, to determine whether it had a duty to defend and whether the policy…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ladner Co., Inc. v. Southern Guaranty Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Auto Mut. Indemnity Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. BlakeneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Sparks Const. Company, Inc. v. General Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
3Cited by18 opinions
- US Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Home Indem. Co. v. AndersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Tanner v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Ala. Farm Bureau Mut. Cas. Ins. v. DyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.