Legal Opinion
Auto Mut. Indemnity Co. v. Moore
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 27, 1938No. 6 Div. 248PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
The facts in this case, as set forth by the pleading filed in the cause, are as follows:
The appellant, Auto Mutual Indemnity Company, a foreign corporation duly licensed and authorized to do insurance business in Alabama, issued a contract of automobile liability insurance to Craig Stracener, appellee, which insurance policy was intended to be and was filed by him, as a contract carrier, with the Alabama Public ,Service Commission under the act of October 28, 1932. Gen.Acts 1932, Ex.Sess., p. 178. On the policy there was an endorsement providing that said insurance policy…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jefferson County Ex Rel. Coleman v. ChiltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HearnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- McWhorter Transfer Co. v. PeekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Harbin v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Leafgreen v. La BarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- American Mut. Liability Ins. Co. v. Agricola FurnaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Employers Ins. Co. of Alabama v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Pacific Electric Railway Co. v. DeweyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Ex Parte MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Morris v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.